Communicate With Mind-Reading

He read my mind perfectly. Walking into thelanguage! On 9/11, al-Qaeda mocked our reliance
kitchen, I said, "Vladimir, I need your help." Heon the human language. At the airports, al-Qaeda
replied, "Okay, coming." Vladimir followed mehijackers said, or didn't say certain words and
down the long hallway at the children's Day Carepassed security check points to commit dreadful
building where we work. We spoke no words.attacks on American land.
Vladimir stopped to get a mop and bucket out ofThe human reaction to our "not knowing an
the closet. We continued walking another 70' andenemy when it is standing in front of us", was to
turned a corner. Here on the floor was a mess ofheftily notch up security measures in airports. The
spilled milk. Vladimir, with the intent to help,Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
shooed me away and uncomplainingly begansystematically implemented x-ray machines and
mopping up the spilled milk.detectors in all airports. I saw these inventions as
Vladimir knew exactly what was in my mind eventemporarily giving us more time to develop our
though it was physically impossible for him to see,Mind-reading skills, or, as providing us with a
or hear, the gallon of milk spill one minute ago.superficial sense of security. The use of inventions
And, it isn't as though I spill milk on a regular basis.is optional, but the reliance on knowingness is
I don't. In fact, the entire time Vladimir and I havemandatory. Otherwise...
worked together, he has never had to mop upChristmas Day, 2009, alleged bomber, Umar
spilled milk.Farouk Abdulmutallab, manages to get through
Vladimir and I are developing the skill to readthe airport security machines, undetected, with a
minds. Mainly out of necessity.bomb of mass destruction hidden in his
I speak English. Vladimir speaks Russian, plus aunderpants on Christmas Day. Abdulmutallab
modicum of English. His grasp on the Englishboards a plane heading for Detroit. Thankfully,
language is either laughable or infuriating. Ashuman inventions are unreliable, because, before
co-workers, I've learned to keep quiet especiallythe plane landed in Detroit, the bomb's detonation
when urgent business is required. I'm quietwent afoul. Passengers were safe. Abdulmutallab
because Vladimir annoys me beyond words withwas arrested.
his self-satisfied belief that we have practicalIn retrospect, Abdulmutallab's father came closest
conversations. We don't. When words areto reading his son's negatively inclined behavior. He
involved, his misunderstanding of the Englisheven warned authorities. The father did not need
language gets irksome and our job productivitya fMRI scanner or a WeCU device. He knew his
plummets. Therefore, silence is the best option.son's expectations were not in line with the
Fortunately, Vladimir makes effort not to assumethoughts of Mind knowing goodness and life.
I'm angry. We then practice improving ourInventions only pick up on trained behavior and
mind-reading skill because Vladimir hasthe past, both of which are quite fickle. How
acknowledged the probability of knowingness.many times have I contemplated bad thoughts
Knowingness results from reading the all-knowingand not acted on them? Many fewer times now
Mind greater than our human minds. Familiaritythan 10 years ago! I am learning to consciously
with the All-knowing allows people to perceivethink before acting, even if my brain is triggering
essential facts that lead to helpful responses. Thisevery which way. From Scientific American," In
differs from the telepathic mind-readers who onlythe end, what the fMRI scanner is picking up is a
read human imprints and memories and whovery noisy, indirect measure of neural activity,
exhibit an aura of mystery. Although I have yetand this creates inherent limits on what's possible.
to meet a person who has not experienced in(
some degree the phenomenon of mind-reading,The physical sciences lack substantial evidence
the skill needs fine tuning.that the brain is the ultimate decision maker.
In the effort to understand mind-reading better,While, Mind-science is accumulating a fine
human beings invent brain scanners and high-techrepertoire of proof-personal and collective-that
machines that can read body language and brainhuman beings are developing the skill of
reactions. However, my rule of thumb is: The useknowingness. The use of human inventions is
of human invention is optional, but the reliance ongiving new observations that change my
knowingness is mandatory. Basically, humanconvictions. I no longer believe mind is in the brain.
inventions can't detect Mind, and are known to beI know the brain is an object in mind. It is
unreliable. We can't even rely on the invention ofmandatory I get to know the All-knowing better!