| Speed reading programs vary greatly in terms of | | | | experts disagree, saying that speed readers |
| what techniques they teach, what they promise, | | | | typically comprehend only 50% of what they are |
| and the actual outcome. This can be confusing if | | | | reading, as opposed to as much as 75% for |
| you have decided to explore speed reading for | | | | regular reading. |
| the first time, and had always thought (like many | | | | Some other speed reading programs teach you |
| of us) that speed reading is just one single | | | | how to speed up the rate of your 'scanning' by |
| concept or technique that can be learnt. Actually, | | | | leading your eyes across the page using the |
| there are at least two major approaches to | | | | sweeping motion of a 'pacer' (which your eyes |
| speed reading that differ in fundamental ways. | | | | naturally follow) or by teaching you to use and |
| Most speed reading programs are based on one | | | | increase your peripheral vision while reading. |
| of these two major approaches to speed reading, | | | | Despite what some experts say about the low |
| though there are also a lot of individual variations | | | | comprehension, there is considerable |
| between the many programs. | | | | documentation of the efficacy of these speed |
| Traditional speed reading programs are based on | | | | reading programs and some people have proven |
| something that we all do naturally - instead of | | | | that they can comprehend just as much |
| reading a passage in detail, there are times when | | | | information as someone who read the exact |
| we just scan it, letting our eyes travel down the | | | | same piece of text at normal reading speed. |
| page quickly. With simple scanning, most people | | | | Some of the newer speed reading programs |
| can read up to 600 or 700 wpm (words per | | | | work on a different principle. They argue that |
| minute), as opposed to 200 - 400 wpm when we | | | | scanning the page in a linear manner, whether or |
| are reading carefully, for comprehension and | | | | not you read every word, is completely |
| study. The first speed reading programs just | | | | unnecessary; in fact, they claim that it even |
| improve on scanning speed. | | | | wastes time. Rather, they posit that the human |
| Many studies corroborate the fact that there is | | | | mind is capable of mentally 'photographing' a |
| no need to read every single word in a passage | | | | complete page of words - taking in everything |
| of text in order to gain comprehension or an | | | | that is on it in its entirety, in a very short period |
| understanding of it - the mind naturally fills in the | | | | of time. Some speed reading programs claim |
| gaps of what we don't actually read. And to put it | | | | incredible success rates based on this principle, |
| simply, the more we 'skip' while reading, the | | | | though it remains controversial. Mainstream |
| faster we can read. Though this varies among | | | | scientists are skeptical about these claims, arguing |
| individuals, it is generally true that a certain | | | | that the programs just teach people to scan |
| amount of material can be skipped without losing | | | | really quickly, and that the overall comprehension |
| very much comprehension. Of course, some | | | | is poor. |