How Not to Teach Context Clues

To most intermediate, middle, high school, andOn the other side are the "Whole Language
college teachers, teaching context clues meansJunkies." These "defenders of the faith" believe
helping students consciously identify and applythat extensive shared, guided, and independent
strategies to figure out the meaning of unknownreading teaches students to read as the readers
words through hints in the surrounding text.gradually acquire the reading strategies (with a
These hints include pictures, syntax, text format,heavy emphasis on context clues) to identify
grammatical constructions, mood or tone,words in the context of reading. Fair to say,
mechanics, and surrounding words that providethese teachers place more emphasis on the
synonym, antonym, logic, or example cluessemantic (meaning-making) cueing components of
Many of these teachers would also label thereading, such as the use of context clues, than on
structural analysis of the unknown word itself asthe graphophonic (visual and phonemic)
a context clue. Using morphemes (meaningfulcomponents of reading. These folks are
word parts, such as Greek and Latinates),nowadays less easily identified, because their side
syllabication strategies, grammatical inflections, andis currently re-trenching in today's "No Child Left
parts of speech also can help students figure ofBehind" educational environment. But, you usually
the meaning of unknown words. Some teacherscan tell who they are by their CLOZE procedure
would also include using hints outside of the text,worksheets, their vast collection of miscue
such as prior knowledge or story schema in theiranalyses, their personal class library of over 1,000
definition and application of context clue strategies.books (crowding out the spaces set aside for
Teaching context clues for vocabularyspelling and grammar workbooks), and their signed
development is widely accepted and practiced.wall posters of Ken Goodman, Margaret Moustafa,
However, there is another application of contextand Stephen Krashen.
clues that is not as widely accepted and practiced.Although the generals argue over tactics, the
This use of context clues is highly controversialstrategic goals of both sides have much in
and stirs up intense debate about how to teachcommon. Both believe that their tactics should
reading.lead to independent meaning-making, that is,
Because the initial task of teaching students toreading comprehension should be the objective.
read largely falls upon the shoulders of primaryBoth agree that reading automaticity (fluency) is
teachers, these teachers tend to be more familiarimportant and that their teaching methodologies,
with this debate than their colleagues who teachthat is, the sound-spelling connections for the
older students. However, the underlying issues of"Phonic-ators," and the "psycholinguistic guessing
this debate are just as relevant to intermediate,games (Goodman)" for the "Whole Language
middle, high school, and college teachers whoJunkies," will best lead to efficient, accurate, and
teach "reading to learn.""unconscious" word recognition. Both believe that
The issues of this debate involve whetherreading is a complex and interactive process, in
context clues should be used as the primarywhich prior knowledge and cognitive ability are
strategy for word identification. Word identificationimportant variables to actively address.
generally means the process of pronouncingSo, having identified the two uses of context
words by applying reading strategies. Wordclues, that is vocabulary development and word
identification should be distinguished from wordidentification, is using context clues for word
recognition, which generally means the ability toidentification a bad thing? My view is that it can be
recognize and pronounce "sight words"when it is taught as the primary strategy for
automatically, without applying reading strategies.identifying words. I personally tend to lean on the
The role of context clues in word identification isresearch that proficient readers rely more on the
the crucial issue behind the Reading Wars.graphophonic (visual and phonemic clues) as their
On one side of the battle are the "Phonic-ators."primary strategies for word identification, while
These "defenders of the faith" believe thatstruggling readers tend to rely on context clues
teaching phonemic awareness and phonics shouldas their primary strategy for word identification.
be the primary means of teaching wordKylene Beers, in her book When Kids Can't Read,
identification. Fair to say, these teachers placesummarizes the problem of using context clues
more emphasis on the graphic cueing componentsfor word identification: "... discerning the meaning of
of reading, that is the alphabetic code,unknown words using context clues requires a
syllabication, and spelling, than do those on thesophisticated interaction with the text that
other side of the battle. The "Phonicators"dependent readers have not yet achieved." The
de-emphasize the use of context clues to "guess"proof is in the pudding: if good readers do A, and
the meanings of words and teach students tobad readers do B, then teachers should teach A
decode words in and out of context. Thesemore than B.
graphic cueing folks are easily identified by theirIt does makes sense that readers need to learn a
sound-spelling wall posters, their phonics andvariety of strategies for word identification so
spelling worksheets, their assessment datathat when one method fails, they have other
matrices, their spelling workbooks, and theirback-up methods to assist. Explicit graphophonic
decodable paper-book stories. Their file drawersinstructional strategies should serve as the first
are filled with Jeanne Chall, Marilyn Adams, andline of attack and semantic instructional strategies,
Keith Stanovich article summaries.using context clues, should serve as back-ups.