Math Fluency Dos and Don'ts - Measuring the Corn

The farmer's wife had her hands full. Besideswithout even thinking about where she was going.
working on the farm in the mornings andShe thought about the difference between
evenings, she taught school to fourth graders -learning the Pledge to the Flag and learning your
which was more than a full-time job! Her biggestway around a new city. One involves
problem was that some of her students couldn'tmemorization, and the other involves
memorize their multiplication facts - and not forremembering-and even though they both have to
lack of trying, on their part or hers. But she wasdo with memory, they are clearly not the same
determined that they would succeed. So everything. Memorization is purely verbal, sometimes
day she gave her students timed tests onhas no connection with experience or conceptual
multiplication, because she knew they needed lotsunderstanding, and is much more
of practice. And every day certain students failedstressful.Remembering, on the other hand, is
to finish on time - so they didn't get to practicelargely non-verbal, is derived from multi-sensory
some of what they needed the most. And everykinesthetic experiences with a spatial/conceptual
day certain students missed the same problemscontext, and generates relatively little stress.
that they had missed the day before. It seemedWhat her low-achieving fourth graders needed,
that they were practicing the wrong answersshe realized, was a mathematical way of
over and over. And every day certain studentsremembering their multiplication facts, rather than
left the same problems blank that they had lefta linguistic way of memorizing them.
blank the day before. They still didn't know theSo she set to work examining her resources and
answers. The teacher appreciated the fact thatthinking about how to use them in more
the timed tests provided an accurate assessmentmathematical ways. First, she made some
of the students' progress - or lack of it. But whychanges in the way she used the timed tests. She
weren't all of the students making the progressorganized the class so that every child had a
she expected?partner, and gave each partner an answer key
One evening she went out to her corn field andfor the timed test. While one partner wrote the
noticed that the corn was not growing very well -answers to the multiplication problems, the other
but she didn't have time to do anything about itpartner compared those answers to the answer
right then. On Saturday she went out to the fieldkey, and gave immediate feedback by pointing to
again for a quick look, and the corn was still notthe written error and saying, "Try again on that
doing well. It looked about the same a couple ofone," or "Fix that one." And then the student
mornings later. That evening while correcting mathwould have to erase the wrong answer and write
papers, she stopped to think about her corn field,in the right one. Then the partners exchanged
and determined that she would have to get outroles. She figured that immediate self-correction
there and do something about it the nextwould eliminate the problem of students
weekend - perhaps start irrigation, or apply aremembering and replicating wrong responses. It
different fertilizer, or.... It suddenly struck her thatis not true, she reasoned that practice makes
her corn was a lot like some of her fourth gradeperfect; only perfect practice makes perfect!
math students. They both had stunted growth.She also eliminated the time limit. What was the
And the mere act of noticing their lack of growthpoint in preventing the slower students from
did nothing to stimulate it. Giving daily speed testsdealing with the facts that they obviously needed
to her students was about as productive andto practice? She replaced the time limit with a
sensible as measuring corn every day andprogress chart which she copied onto every
expecting it to grow as a result of beingtimed test, which looked like this:
measured! Tests measure growth - they do not--- --- Progress Chart:
stimulate it! Tests are assessment tools, not4:00 3:30 3:00 2:45 2:30 2:15 2:00 1:50 1:40 1:30
learning development tools!1:20 1:10 1:00
She realized that she needed some kind ofShe used an overhead timer (or the clock on the
mathematical fertilizer that would bring out herwall with a second hand). When the students
students' natural ability to think, remember, andfinished the last problem, they looked up to see
perform mathematically. She felt that giving up onwhat their individual time was. Then they circled all
daily measurement would not improve thethe times that they passed. The faster they
situation for those children, but continuing it wouldwere, the more times they got to circle. The
not improve it either. Something more waschildren were quite enthusiastic about circling the
needed. She had already presented many lessonstimes, and started asking if they could do more
aimed at developing the concepts of multiplicationtimed tests so they could try to beat their old
and division, and most of the students hadtimes. Some children liked to compete with each
responded pretty well. She realized that theother for the fastest time, and that made them
students' understanding of those conceptswant to practice more before the test. Other
provided a meaningful basis for the acquisition ofchildren just liked to try to beat their own
fluent recall of the facts-but that understandingpreviously best time. The teacher liked to include
itself did not actually develop fluent memory forsome very slow times on the progress chart, so
many of her lower-achieving students.that even the slowest students could pass
One day as she walked down the hall, the teacherseveral speed levels-which made them want to
passed her own first-grade daughter's classroomget faster, too. She noticed that their enthusiasm
and heard the class enthusiastically singing Frerefor the challenge increased, and their anxiety
Jacques. She loved the sound of their sweet littledecreased.
voices. But she was suddenly struck by a singularBut she was still concerned about one thing with
thought: those children probably had no idea whatthe timed tests. When some students made
they were singing about. And even if the musicmistakes and were directed by their partners to
teacher had translated the song for them, the"Try again," they didn't really know the correct
children certainly would not know which Frenchanswer and tended to just guess. And their
words corresponded with the English words theyguesses didn't seem to make any sense. One day
knew. They had fluent recall of the words, butshe took the place of one student who was
could not use them to develop their understandingabsent and served as the partner during a timed
of the French language. Come to think of it, hertest. The student wrote a wrong answer for 7 x
little daughter had fluent recall of most of the7. The teacher told the child to "try again" (which
words to the Pledge to the Flag-which is inis a positive way of saying, "You missed it, but
English-but she didn't know what most of thoseyou can fix it now"). The child guessed "102?"
words meant, either. And when she proudlyApparently the teacher's face must have
recited, "...and to the republic for Richard stands,"displayed a look of disbelief, because the child
she never thought to ask anyone who this guyimmediately guessed again: "77?"
Richard was. She also never asked who RoundThe teacher pointed to the student's paper and
John Virgin was when singing Silent Night, or whosaid, "Look at this other problem you already did.
Gladly the cross-eyed bear was, when singing inIt says "6 x 7," and you answered "42," and you
church; she just sang the words. Apparently thewere right! So if six times seven is forty-two,
prodigious talent for linguistic mimicry andthen seven times seven must be..." "Eighty-nine?"
memorization does not always connect with theguessed the child. The teacher hoped that her hint
mental realm of curiosity and understanding.would cause him to add seven more to 42, using
Reflecting on this made the teacher think of awhat he knew (six groups of seven) to figure out
couple of her math students, who were quitewhat he didn't know (seven groups of seven).
successful on the timed memory tests, but didn'tApparently, though, the pupil didn't actually
seem to connect their memorized facts to theunderstand the fact that he supposedly "knew." It
concepts that they understood, or to the storyseemed that he knew 6 x 7 the same way a
problems they perpetually struggled with.first-grader knows the Pledge to the Flag, or
Then she recalled something strange the musicFrere Jacques-divorced from any meaning, devoid
teacher had told her some months before. He hadof understanding, and not susceptible of intelligent
announced one day to the kindergarten class thatuse in changing contexts. He was thinking in terms
he was going to teach them a new song, andof "what is the right word for this answer?" as
instructed them to listen quietly while he sang theopposed to "what amount would make sense
song for them. Much to his surprise, they startedhere?" In short, he was dealing with a
singing the new song right along with him-evenmathematical situation in a linguistic way, rather
though he knew they had never heard it beforethan in a mathematical way.
in their lives. Somehow they were able toThe teacher suddenly remembered a technique
instantaneously imitate both the words and theshe had learned at a math workshop that was
tune of the new song! The farmer's wife begandesigned to mold students' thinking about
to sense a relation between the kindergarteners'multiplication in a more mathematical way. She
incredible feat of mimicry and the behavior of adidn't know where the handout pages from the
fourth-grader in her own class who wasworkshop were, so she drew a picture that she
apparently making use of that very same talent.could use to organize the student's sense of
He could never say the multiples of seven outcounting by sevens. First, she drew a row of
loud by himself; but he had no trouble in sayingseven boxes, putting a little space between each
them when the whole class chanted them aloudbox. Then she drew another row just like it
together. In fact, she mused, if all the studentsunderneath, and another, and so on until she had
possessed this capacity (and she suspected thatseven rows of boxes, with seven in each row.
they did), then it would take only one student inThen she guided the student like this: "Touch and
the class who could say the sevens aloudcount the first row of boxes." The pupil touched
correctly, and she would automatically have aeach box and counted "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7." "Now
whole class who could say them together-and sheswipe your finger across the whole row of boxes
would not be able to tell by looking who reallyand say "seven." The boy did so. "Now touch and
knew what they were doing, and who didn't!count the next row: eight, nine..." The student
She looked down and noticed that her shoe wastouched them and counted "8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
untied. As she bent down to tie it, a fellow14." "Now let's review: swipe the first row and
teacher came down the hall. As they exchangedsay..." The boy swiped the first row and said
pleasantries, she continued tying her shoe without"seven." "Swipe the next row and say..." He traced
being conscious of what her own fingers werehis finger across the next row and said "fourteen."
doing. When she stood up, she realized in theThe student continued touching and counting: "15,
midst of her conversation what she had just16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21" and swiping: "7, 14, 21." The
done. It was like when she played music on theteacher asked, "How many boxes are in each
piano from memory; sometimes when her mindrow?" "Seven." How many rows have you
wandered, her fingers just carried on with thecounted and swiped so far?" "Three rows." "Three
music all by themselves. It was as if her musclesrows of seven makes how many boxes?"
had a mind and memory of their own, and they"Twenty-one." "So three times seven is...?"
could do things without her conscious participation."Twenty-one!" "I wonder how you could find out
Just then her colleague asked her for the phonewhat seven times seven is?," mused the teacher
number of a mutual friend. The farmer's wifealoud. "I know what to do!" And the pupil
often dialed that number several times a week,continued touching-and-counting the next row,
but she just could not think of it now that shethen swiping to review the accumulated
was asked. It was odd, but sometimes herrows-slowly developing his memory of the
fingers remembered phone numbers better thanmultiples of seven in a tactile/kinesthetic, spatial,
her conscious mind did. So she took out her cellcontext-derived way-until he finally got to 7 x 7.
phone and went through the motions of dialing theThen he absolutely knew that 7 x 7 = 49-no
number. She watched what her fingers did, andmore guessing. Then the teacher wondered aloud,
told her colleague the phone number."I wonder if you could use this same technique to
Later in the day, she spent some time thinkingfigure out 4 x 6?" She took a piece of paper and
about memory and how it works. A few times incovered the bottom three rows of boxes, so
her life, she had smelled aromas that remindedthat only four rows remained visible. The she slid
her of other places and times in her past.another piece of paper over the last vertical
Olfactory memories like those did not have wordscolumn of boxes on the right end, so that each
connected to them. Nor did her shoe-lace/pianorow appeared to contain only six boxes. She then
phone muscle-memories consciously connect withwatched with approval as the boy demonstrated
verbalization. And whenever she was donehow to touch-and-count and swipe four groups of
shopping at the mall, she usually rememberedsix.
where she had parked her car without stoppingThe teacher realized that this system of
to think about it-and that was not a verbalorganized counting was very different from filling
memory, either. It was more of ain the blank boxes in a standard multiplication
spatial-kinestheticchart-which she henceforth thought of as "A
experiencing-and-remembering-similar to theTable of Someone Else's Answers." Filling out the
experience she had in learning the new locationschart does not require students to count or think
of her kitchen utensils, when her husband hadin terms of groups. It assumes that the learners
remodeled the kitchen and put everything in newhave already mastered skip-counting; it is merely
places. She certainly did not use flash cards tocreating an occasion to recall what is already
memorize their new places, nor did she pressureknown. But if that mastery has not already taken
herself with stern reprimands ("Come on,place, assigning a student to fill in the chart is just
concentrate! You just did this yesterday!") whenanother way of asking, "What is the word for
she didn't relocate something on the first try; shethat answer?" And that query is more likely to
just opened drawers until she found what shestimulate a purely verbally-based response (rote
was looking for. After a few days, she knewmemory) than a statement of fact that is backed
where everything was; there was nothing verbalup by mathematical reasoning and supported by a
about it.context-derived flow of memory.
And this reminded her of how she had learnedAfter several days of implementing these new
her way around St. Louis on her first time thereapproaches to helping her students, the teacher
for an extended two week visit. As she becamewas very pleased to see the progress they were
more familiar with the buildings and parks andmaking. They seemed to be feeling less stress
streets that she saw as she drove around theand anxiety, too. That evening at the dinner table
city, she referred to her map less and less untilshe shared her good news with her husband, who
she rarely used the map at all-because she hadsaid, "That's great, honey. And whatever you did
developed an internal map in her mind. Afterwith the corn last weekend is sure working well.
several days, she could drive to several locationsIt's looking a lot better now.